Skip to main content

Architecture

A non-contributor overview of how tsundoku is put together. For the contributor-level deep dive, read CLAUDE.md in the repo.

One process, single SQLite file​

tsundoku is a single Rust binary built on axum 0.8, tokio, and sea-orm. The HTTP server, the cron scheduler, the resolver, and the metadata-provider implementations all run in one process.

State lives in one SQLite file at ${data_dir}/db/tsundoku.db. The pool is pinned to a single connection so per-connection PRAGMAs (foreign_keys = ON, busy_timeout = 5000) actually stick. No multi-writer model, no read replicas, no PostgreSQL fallback.

Three layers​

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  HTTP API (axum, td-api)                                 │
│  + admin SPA (React 19 + Mantine 9, embedded via         │
│  rust-embed behind the embed-frontend feature)           │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                          │
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  Resolution pipeline (td-resolution)                     │
│                                                          │
│  1. Known external ID  (catalog hit)                     │
│  2. Foreign-ID lookup  (active provider)                 │
│  3. Fuzzy title        (cleaned query, Dice rescore)     │
│  4. Format → kind validation                             │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
        │                                  │
┌───────┴────────────────┐    ┌────────────┴───────────────┐
│ Discovery sources      │    │ Metadata providers         │
│ (td-source +           │    │ (td-metadata +             │
│  td-source-nyaa)       │    │  td-metadata-mangabaka)    │
└────────────────────────┘    └────────────────────────────┘

Sources​

A source polls some upstream feed and emits DiscoveredRelease records. v1 ships only Nyaa (RSS feed + per-post HTML enrichment). The DiscoverySource trait is the contract; adding a new source means writing a td-source-<name> crate.

Resolution pipeline​

The pipeline turns a raw release row into either a series_id link (resolved) or a review-queue card. It runs four steps in a fixed order:

  1. Known external ID — short-circuit if the release's external links already point at a series the catalog knows about.
  2. Foreign-ID lookup — ask the active provider whether it recognizes the foreign IDs (MangaUpdates, AniList, MAL, MangaDex).
  3. Fuzzy title — clean the raw title (strip parens, brackets, volume markers, format keywords, year tokens, split on multi-title separators), search the active provider, Dice-rescore against the cleaned query, keep the best hit.
  4. Format-to-kind validation — once a candidate is chosen, check that the release's detected formats are consistent with the series's kind. A mismatch demotes the release to ambiguous.

Confident matches auto-resolve. Plausible-but-low-confidence matches land in the review queue.

Providers​

A provider is a metadata source the resolver talks to. v1 ships MangaBaka with an offline-first design — a nightly SQLite dump opened read-only as a side database, queried via an FTS5 mirror. The MetadataProvider trait is the contract; adding a new provider means writing a td-metadata-<name> crate.

Multiple providers can be registered, but exactly one is designated metadata.active_provider and runs the auto-resolution path.

Scheduler​

tokio-cron-scheduler on top of a JobLocks map of per-source and per-provider tokio::Mutex instances. Each cron job try_locks its key; if another tick (or a manual trigger) is already in flight, the new tick is dropped with a debug log. Manual POST /sources/{name}/poll shares the same lock — manual and scheduled work can't race.

Real-time updates​

Currently: TanStack Query polling on the frontend. No SSE, no WebSockets. Discovery is a low-frequency activity (polls run on cron, minutes apart); the operational cost of a push channel would buy nothing here. A future phase may revisit if a workflow needs live push.

Auth model​

Single-user, single-host, single SQLite file. Auth is config-driven:

  • auth.read_requires_auth = false → reads are public.
  • auth.read_requires_auth = true + auth.api_key = "..." → reads require the key.
  • Writes always require auth.admin_token as a Bearer token.
  • Missing admin_token returns 503 Misconfigured (distinct from 401) so fresh deploys don't look like credentialing bugs.

No users table, no sessions, no JWT. If multi-user becomes a requirement, that's a major rewrite — not a flag flip.

Why standalone instead of a Codex plugin?​

Codex's release-tracking flow is matched-by-default (alias-driven). tsundoku is unmatched-by-default: it scans firehoses for series the user has not yet imported. Bolting that shape onto Codex would permanently bloat its schema for a workflow that doesn't generalize. The series.owned column on series is reserved as a future hook; how it gets populated depends on what Codex's HTTP API exposes when that integration happens.

Why SQLite?​

Single-user, single-author, single-host workload. The biggest live table after a year of polling is well under a million rows. Postgres would be operational overhead with no payoff at this scale. If the workload ever crosses multi-writer territory, sea-orm's sqlx-postgres feature is a flag flip — but no current path leads there.